阿拉伯商业与管理评论杂志

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 140 ?????????????? (OCAI)?Kirton ???-???? (KAI) ??????? (MBI) ?????????????????????? 24 ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

In this study, we suggest a product development methodology from the view of customer satisfaction. By identifying the importance level of each quality element of a product and providing the functional relation of the quality model. In the analysis process, we calculate the weight of importance of each quality element. Then, we apply a method using utility functions as a functional expression of quality model. By combining the weight of importance and these utility functions, it is possible to identify the degree of importance and the quality model. In the synthesis process, we apply group decision making stress method to synthesize the view of each evaluator because each evaluator’s view differs that is realistically difficult to conform to each person. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted a case study regarding the choice of cars and confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This paper investigated whether the historical ideas are useful for designing the business strategic and has examined how historical ideas could be helpful in designing new era of business strategic. Nowadays the relationship between historical ideas and modern business strategies has seen a good impact on production of the businesses. And we have seen that there is a huge competition among different business companies, especially Telecom and Computer industries of the world. It is also noted that, are historical ideas helpful for the new era business strategy? Whether the historical ideas are implemented on business strategies and modern business techniques? To find out at what extent historical ideas could helpful in designing new era business strategic. However, Emirates Telecommunications Corporation purchased a 26% stake in PTCL and assumed management control of the company. Fixed-line subscriptions declined from a peak of 5.2 million in 2005-06 to 3.4 million in 2009-10.

Financial inclusion is defined as an activity of facilitating banking as well as financial services to the low income group people and people from most vulnerable group in the society. The successful achievement of financial inclusion can be done by the most effective and transparent financial services. In India, government has taken several initiatives to foster financial inclusion. Financial Institutions like banks has shown an immense increase in its extent to provide their banking services to the people from the unreached and excluded sections in the society. But World Bank Global Findex Database 2014 has highlighted that, in India 21% of adults are unbanked and only 53% of adult population possess financial services from a formal financial institutions. This paper identifies that financial literacy, high cost, technology, trust, income level, distance and inappropriate products are the factors that determine the financial inclusion in rural areas. This study discusses about the various innovative delivery channels used to reach the rural people and a conceptual model is developed to find out the factors that drives the financial inclusion.

The technology has leveraged innovative modes of socializing, from facebook to twitter, man has become more social than ever before. But is the social media only limited to networking with the friends and reference groups or is there is more to it. This has been a big challenge for marketers to understand this consumer behavior. Since the interactions between people on these media are not only limited to personal chats but also include sharing experiences about purchases, preferences for brands and personal feelings about products. In response to its growing acceptability, popularity and impact the businesses are also turning to social media to market, promote their products and to interact with their customer and understand their changing needs and behavior. The present paper investigates the influence of support taken from social platforms on internet purchasing in India. The implications for the practitioners and researchers are discussed.

Tough service conditions with high risk, relatively poor salaries, limited promotional avenues, frequent transfers and disruption in family life could be some of the reasons due to which the Indian Armed Forces are facing a severe manpower crunch in their officer’s cadre. Setting up of pay commissions on regular basis to review pay structure, up gradation of some of the ranks and appointment have also not been able to create a sense of wellbeing. Effective recruitment, competitive compensation, efficient training and development to retain the manpower available, has therefore become a greater challenge to the military leaders. This research was undertaken to analyse relevance of best human resource practices prevalent in the corporate sector and their application in Indian Armed forces to assist them in attracting and retaining the best talent. This paper concludes with the recommendations suggesting methodology and timelines to implement the findings to improve human resource management in the Armed forces.

?????? Quaid-e-Azam ???????????????????????????????????????20 ?? 70 ??????????????? 20 ??????????????????????????? 5000 ?????? 11-15% ????????????????????????????? 1981 ? 1 ?????????????????????????????????????? 30 ?????????????????????????? 200 ??????????????????????? AID ???????????????????????????????????????????????? GIB ??????? SC?IV?DV?ROA ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 13000 ???????? 1200 ????????????????????????????????2000 ?????????????????

???????????????????????????????????????????????/??/????????????????????????????????????? 4 ???? 4 ??????????????????? 4 ???????? 50 ?????????????????????????????????????? 50 ????????????? 3 ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/??????????????????????????????????????????

The family work conflict (FWC) is analyzed in this paper within the Conservation of Resources Theory (COR) (Hobfoll, 1989). Three concepts were addressed in order to analyze the FWC: family resources, work resources, and organizational distress. Previous organizational research showed the importance of controlling for gender, age, and SES, elements taken into account in this paper. Based in the GSS and NOS mixed database of 1991, results support the idea of the correlation of number of children less than 12 years old and FWC. Likewise, relations between managers and workers and FWC showed the highest significance in the model (p < 0.0005). In accordance with COR, the age of respondent and marital status are negatively correlated with FWC, supporting the idea that the more the resources that a person has, the less the conflict he/she has with coping with stressful situations.

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 92 ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

?????????????????????????????????? (CPC) ????????? 2004 ? C25 ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? CPC ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2004 ? C25 ????????????????????????????????????????????????

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????“????”??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????“?????”???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

???????????? 2000 ?? 2014 ??????????????????????? (SENSEX) ? KSE 100 ???????????????????????? Johanson ???Granger ??????????????????????????????? (SENSEX) ????? (KSE?CSE) ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? SENSEX ?????????? (KSE100?CSE) ????????????????????????

???????????????????????????????????????? 10 ? KSE ?????? 2009 ?? 2014 ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 15 ??? 30 ??????????? 5 ???2009-2014 ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? SPSS ????????????????????

??????????? 2002 ?? 2008 ???????????????????????????????????? (ROA) ?????? (ROE) ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? T ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1991 ???????? (FDI) ?????????????????????FDI ?????????????????? FDI ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????“?????? (FDI) ???????????GDP ??????????”?????? FDI ?????????????????????????? (Ho)??????? FDI ?????????? GDP (He) ?????????????????????????????????????? GDP ?????????????????????????????????????????????????·???·??·?????“????”?“????”???????????????????????????????????? (FDI)???????? FDI??????????????????????? (GDP) ?????????????????????????????????????????????????

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????